Oyeniran

Oyeniran v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
672 F.3d 800·2012 WL 695646·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 201209-73683, 10-70689California3,806 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

Petitioner Daniel O. Oyeniran (“Oyeniran”), a citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of decisions by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to deny him protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and to deny his motion to reopen the case to consider new evidence. We hold that collateral estoppel binds the BIA to its prior determination of the facts and legal consequences regarding past inci dents of government-sponsored violence against Oyeniran’s family due to his father’s activities supporting Christianity over Islam. We also conclude that the BIA abused its discretion by denying Oyeniran’s motion to reopen to consider the significant new evidence of a Nigerian arrest warrant that charges Oyeniran personally with inciting opposition to Sharia law. On remand, the BIA should consider all the new evidence, including Oyeniran’s voluntary trip to visit his sick mother; however, the BIA’s prior findings of fact constitute a baseline on which the BIA evaluates Oyeniran’s current CAT application to determine whether it is more likely or not that he will be tortured if removed to Nigeria. We grant Oyeniran’s petitions and remand for further proceedings consistent with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.