Lyndsey Ballinger v. City of Oakland
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LYNDSEY BALLINGER; SHARON No. 19-16550
BALLINGER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-07186- v. HSG
CITY OF OAKLAND,
Defendant-Appellee. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 22, 2020 Submission Withdrawn July 16, 2021 Resubmitted January 25, 2022 San Francisco, California
Filed February 1, 2022
Before: Richard R. Clifton, N. Randy Smith, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge R. Nelson SUMMARY *
Civil Rights
The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the City of Oakland’s Uniform Residential Tenant Relocation Ordinance, which requires landlords re-taking occupancy of their homes upon the expiration of a lease to pay tenants a relocation payment.
Plaintiffs alleged that the relocation fee is an unconstitutional physical taking of their money for a private rather than public purpose and without…