Luis Mendoza Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 202220-73042California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 1 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS FELIPE MENDOZA No. 20-73042

HERNANDEZ; MARIA A. SALAS

ESPINOZA; RAUL D. SANOVAL Agency Nos. A208-930-199 SALAS; JOSE R. MENDOZA SALAS., A208-930-165

A208-930-166

Petitioners, A208-930-167

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2021** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and LIBURDI,*** District Judge.

Luis Felipe Mendoza Hernandez (Mendoza), his wife, Maria Salas Espinoza

(Salas), and their two minor children (collectively, the petitioners), petition for

review of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.