Ahern

Ahern v. Asset Management Consultants

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2022B309935California8,380 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/1/22

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THOMAS AHERN et al., B309935

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC484356) v.

ASSET MANAGEMENT

CONSULTANTS, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel J. Buckley and Ann I. Jones, Judges. Reversed and remanded with directions. Catanzarite Law Corporation, Kenneth J. Catanzarite, Nicole M. Catanzarite-Woodward and Eric V. Anderton for Plaintiffs and Appellants Thomas Ahern and Amlap Ahern, LLC. Jackson Tidus and Charles M. Clark for Defendants and Respondents Asset Management Consultants, Inc., BH & Sons, LLC and James R. Hopper. _______________________ The superior court granted the petition filed by Asset Management Consultants, Inc. (AMC), BH & Sons, LLC and James R. Hopper (collectively BH parties) to confirm an arbitration award dismissing the investment fraud claims of Thomas Ahern and Amlap Ahern, LLC (collectively Ahern parties) as barred by the governing statutes of limitation; denied the Ahern parties’ petition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.