Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 202221-16279California1,508 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIUS BRADFORD, No. 21-16279

Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY v.

CALVIN JOHNSON; ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM*

GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF

NEVADA,

Respondents-Appellants.

JULIUS BRADFORD, No. 21-16373

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01784-RFB-EJY v.

CALVIN JOHNSON; ATTORNEY

GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF

NEVADA,

Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 14, 2022

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, NGUYEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Julius Bradford, a Nevada prisoner, filed a federal habeas petition alleging

seventeen claims. “Ground 2” alleged that even though his trial counsel in the

“Zambrano-Lopez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.