Aston Whitehead v. Pacifica Senior Living Mgmt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 202221-15035California2,362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ASTON WHITEHEAD, individually and on No. 21-15035 behalf of the general public as an aggrieved employee under the Private Attorneys D.C. No. 4:18-cv-01767-JSW General Act,

Plaintiff-Appellant, MEMORANDUM*

v.

PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING

MANAGEMENT LLC; PACIFICA

OAKLAND LLC,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BERZON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. On appeal are Plaintiff Aston Whitehead’s state and federal claims against

Pacifica Senior Living Management LLC and Pacifica Oakland LLC (“Pacifica”)

for discrimination, retaliation, and wage and hour violations, arising under Title VII,

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.