Aston Whitehead v. Pacifica Senior Living Mgmt
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 2 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ASTON WHITEHEAD, individually and on No. 21-15035 behalf of the general public as an aggrieved employee under the Private Attorneys D.C. No. 4:18-cv-01767-JSW General Act,
Plaintiff-Appellant, MEMORANDUM*
v.
PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING
MANAGEMENT LLC; PACIFICA
OAKLAND LLC,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 22, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BERZON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. On appeal are Plaintiff Aston Whitehead’s state and federal claims against
Pacifica Senior Living Management LLC and Pacifica Oakland LLC (“Pacifica”)
for discrimination, retaliation, and wage and hour violations, arising under Title VII,
the…