Debra Balestra-Leigh v. Jessica Balestra

Good Law
471 F. App'x 636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 201210-17621California284 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Debra M. Balestra-Leigh and Stephen M. Balestra appeal from the district court’s judgment in their diversity action against Jessica K. Balestra alleging breach of contract and various torts related to their deceased father’s estate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1072 (9th Cir.2005), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because appellants failed to allege facts sufficient to state any claim for relief. See Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc., 114 Nev. 441 , 956 P.2d 1382, 1387 (1998) (explaining elements of negligent misrepresentation claim and that the claim applies only within a “business or commercial transaction”); Wichinsky v. Mosa, 109 Nev. 84 , 847 P.2d 727, 729-30 (1993) (elements of intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claim); Bernard v. Rockhill Dev. Co., 103 Nev. 132 , 734 P.2d 1238, 1240 (1987) (“A breach of contract may be said to be a material failure of performance of a duty arising under or imposed by agreement.”). Moreover, appellants point to no Nevada law recognizing their claims for tortious inter ference with expectancy of inheritance or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.