United States v. Robertos Landeros-Morales

Good Law
471 F. App'x 663
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 201211-50368California135 words

Opinion

Robertos Landeros-Morales appeals from the 10-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

Landeros-Morales contends that the district court procedurally erred by relying on factors excluded from 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e), specifically, punishment. It is unclear from the record whether those factors served as the primary basis for the sentence imposed. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for resentencing.

In light of this disposition, we decline to reach Landeros-Morales’s other arguments.

VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.