San Luis Obispo Local etc. v. Central Coast Development etc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 2022B304144California1,290 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

I

LAFCO I

Central Coast Development Company (Central Coast) owns a 154-acre parcel of property within the sphere of influence of the City of Pismo Beach (City).2 Central Coast wants to construct 252 single-family residences and 60 senior housing units on the parcel. The City approved Central Coast's application for a development permit for the property. The City and Central Coast applied to the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to annex the property. The LAFCO application signed by the City and Central Coast contained the following indemnity agreement: “As part of this application, Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, hold harmless and release the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), its officers, employees, attorneys, or agents from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of them, the purpose of which is to attack, set aside, void, or annul, in whole or in part, LAFCO's action on the proposal or on the environmental documents submitted to or prepared by LAFCO in connection with the proposal. This indemnification obligation shall include, but not be limited to, damages, costs, expenses, attorneys'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.