Marriage of Ochner CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 2/3/22 Marriage of Ochner CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re the Marriage of CYNTHIA and
JAMES OCHNER.
CYNTHIA OCHNER,
E075272
Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. SWD1301643) v.
OPINION
JAMES OCHNER,
Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Timothy F. Freer, Judge.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Holstrom, Block & Parke and Ronald B. Funk for Appellant.
La Quinta Law Group and Timothy L. Ewanyshyn for Respondent.
James Ochner appeals from a family court order, which denied in part and granted
in part his petition for modification of spousal support and granted Cynthia Ochner’s
request for order (RFO) seeking attorney fees and reimbursement for tax payments and
1 medical expenses. James1 contends the court erred in its analysis of the…