Kesterson

Kesterson v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 2022B304766California10,790 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chavez, J.

Filed 2/3/22 Kesterson v. Cal. Public Employees’ Retirement System CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARY KESTERSON et al., B304766

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC502628) v.

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC

EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT

SYSTEM et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David S. Cunningham, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. Law Offices of John Michael Jensen and John Michael Jensen for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Reed Smith, Raymond A. Cardozo and Terence N. Hawley for Defendants and Appellants. Plaintiffs Mary Kesterson, Marcel Poché, Michael Gilmore, the Estate of Robert Seymore (by his personal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.