In re Mark L. CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following possible issues which were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal. 1. Whether the court’s award of restitution for the juvenile victim’s hospital expenses paid by his health insurance was proper if the victim’s mother decides to keep the funds and does not reimburse the insurance company. 2. Whether the court’s award of restitution for the juvenile victim’s hospital expenses paid by his health insurance was proper if the victim’s mother had a prior agreement with the insurance company to reimburse them. 3. Whether the court’s award of restitution for the mother’s lost vacation time was proper. 4. Whether the court’s award of restitution for which defendant’s mother is severally responsible should be limited as she was not informed of the amount until after disposition of the case. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for…