Romero
Romero v. Holder
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Victor M. Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Department of Homeland Security’s order reinstating his 1992 exclusion order under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(5). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo due process claims and questions of law, Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 539 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
Because Romero failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice in his initial exclusion proceeding, he may not at this point collaterally attack his 1992 exclusion order. See id. at 1137-38 (while a petitioner is generally prevented from collaterally attacking an underlying removal order on constitutional or legal grounds, 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D) permits some measure of review if he can demonstrate a “gross miscarriage of justice” in the prior proceedings).
Romero’s contention that the agency erred in applying the reinstatement provision to him because he is eligible for adjustment of status under the special adjustment provision, 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (i), is unpersuasive. See Padilla v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921, 925-26 (9th Cir.2003).