SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. AND POWER v. Lee

Good Law
672 F.3d 1176·2012 WL 858877
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 201210-17895California2,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

SILVERMAN, J.

Before: A. WALLACE TASHIMA and BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and MARVIN J. GARBIS, Senior District Judge. [*]

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Two non-Indian entities brought this action to enjoin Navajo Nation tribal officials from applying tribal law to them in tribal courts. They claim that both their contract with the tribe and federal law deprive tribal officials of authority to regulate them. This appeal presents the question whether the Navajo Nation itself—which enjoys sovereign immunity and cannot be sued—is a necessary (and if so, indispensable) party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. We hold today that the tribe is not a necessary party because the tribal officials can be expected to adequately represent the tribe's interests in this action and because complete relief can be accorded among the existing parties without the tribe. This lawsuit for prospective injunctive relief may proceed against the officials under a routine application of Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 , 28 S.Ct. 441 , 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908), and should not have been dismissed.

Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District co-owns, and Headwaters Resources, Inc. operates, a power…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.