Northern Cal. Environmental Defense Center v. City of Chico CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 2022C092612California3,598 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/4/22 Northern Cal. Environmental Defense Center v. City of Chico CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL C092612

DEFENSE CENTER,

(Super. Ct. No. 18CV04048) Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CITY OF CHICO,

Defendant and Respondent;

EPICK HOMES et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

This action arises from respondent City of Chico’s (the City) approval of a mixed- use development project, Stonegate (Stonegate or the project). Northern California Environmental Defense Center (appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of its petition for writ of mandate against real parties in interest and respondents Epick Homes, Epick, Inc., and Chris Giampaoli (together, Epick), as well as the City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.