Zeddrick White v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP

MEMORANDUM

Zeddrick F. White appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging, inter alia, violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Intri-Plex Techs., Inc. v. Crest Grp., Inc., 499 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed White’s third claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted because White failed to present any legal basis for his claim. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

Although the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting Deloitte & Touche’s request for judicial notice, see Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir.2001), dismissal of White’s first and second claims on the basis of res judicata was improper because the allegations contained in these claims arose after White’s last judgment on the merits in state court, see San Diego Police Officers’ Ass’n v. San Diego City Emps.’ Ret. Sys., 568 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir.2009)(applying California claim preclusion law to determine a California judgment’s effect on a subsequent federal case and listing…