Charlotte Yee v. Hilda Solis

MEMORANDUM

Charlotte S. Yee appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her employment action alleging discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII, as well as claims under the Privacy Act and the Civil Service Reform Act (“CSRA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Yee’s race and sex discrimination claims because Yee failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether she was subjected to an adverse employment action, whether similarly situated individuals outside of her protected class were treated more favorably, and whether the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for defendant’s actions were pretextual. See id. at 640-41 & n. 5 (requirements for discrimination claim); Chuang v. Univ. of Cal. Davis, Bd. of Trustees, 225 F.3d 1115, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2000) (discussing “adverse employment action”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Yee’s retaliation claim because Yee failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether she was subjected to…