United States v. Jose Osua-Madricales

Good Law
472 F. App'x 535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 201210-10418California296 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Manuel Osua-Madricales appeals from the 45-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Osua-Madricales’ counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. We ordered counsel for both parties to submit supplemental letter briefs to the court addressing whether, in light of this court’s recent decision in Reina-Rodriguez v. United States, 655 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2011), the district court properly applied a 16-level sentencing enhancement based on defendant’s 2003 conviction under Arizona Revised Statute § 13-3407.

We decline the government’s request to take judicial notice of documents that are not part of the district court record. See id. at 1193. We remand to the district court so that the district court can apply a modified categorical approach in determining whether Osua-Madricales was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.