Cir

Taproot Administrative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner

Good Law
679 F.3d 1109·2012 WL 933908·109 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1446·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5865
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 201210-70892California6,077 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hudson, J.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, certain eligible corporations may elect S corporation status, thereby acting as pass-through entities for federal taxation purposes. The rules governing eligibility to elect S corporation status restrict various attributes those corporations may have, including the number of shareholders, the classes of stock issued, and the types of shareholders. The single question presented is whether a corporate taxpayer is ineligible for S corporation status, and therefore must be taxed as a C corporation, because its sole shareholder is a custodial Roth Individual Retirement Account (Roth IRA). Taproot Administrative Services, Inc. (Taproot) contends that a Roth IRA cannot be distinguished from its individual owner under a reasonable interpretation of the governing statute. Adhering to this construction, Taproot thus argues that it satisfies the S corporation requirements. For the reasons that follow, we disagree with Taproot and affirm the decision of the Tax Court.

I.

Qualifying small business corporations may affirmatively elect S corporation status for federal income tax purposes. I.R.C. §§ 1361(a), 1362(a)(1) (2006). Under I.R.C. §§ 1363(a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.