Randy Hutton v. Jackson County

Good Law
472 F. App'x 568
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 201210-36135California270 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Appellant Randy Hutton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his employer, Jackson County, on Hutton’s claim for breach of contract. We affirm. Even assuming Hutton had an employment contract with the County providing that he could only be fired for cause, the record shows that the County had good cause to discharge him.

Hutton is not a civil service employee whose termination would be subject to procedural due process requirements. See Papadopoulos v. Or. State Bd. of Higher Educ., 14 Or.App. 130 , 511 P.2d 854, 870-72 (1973). Accordingly, we review the County’s action under the standard set forth in Simpson v. Western Graphics Corp., 53 Or.App. 205 , 631 P.2d 805 (1981), aff'd 293 Or. 96 , 643 P.2d 1276 (1982). Under this standard, a reviewing court “need only find that there was substantial evidence to support the employer’s decision and that the employer believed that evidence and acted in good faith in discharging the worker.” Id. at 808.

It is undisputed that Hutton received multiple reprimands for violating the County’s vehicle policy and that he took firewood from a County park for personal use at his home without permission. These…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.