Raul Mendez-Colin v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 202220-71846California417 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 4 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL DANIEL MENDEZ-COLIN, No. 20-71846

Petitioner, Agency No. A090-835-140

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 19, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,*** District Judge.

Raul Daniel Mendez-Colin petitions this Court for review of the decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion seeking, among

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. other outcomes, rescission of his in absentia removal order. The Immigration &

Nationality Act allows…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.