Richard Norton v. Michael Astrue

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 201210-55878California566 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 30 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD L. NORTON, No. 10-55878

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:09-cv-01865-R-CT

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2012 ** Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and PRATT, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Iowa, sitting by designation. Richard L. Norton (“Norton”) appeals from a denial of disability insurance

benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The

Administrative Law Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.