Kanti Gala v. William Britt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 201211-15111California168 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 04 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KANTI GALA, an individual; et al., No. 11-15111

Plaintiffs-counter-defendants D.C. No. 2:10-cv-00079-RLH-RJJ - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM B. BRITT, an individual; et al.,

Defendants-counter-claimants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 16, 2012 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE and BEA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.**

The district court’s judgment is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to

the district court to consider whether subject matter jurisdiction exists in this

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Northern Iowa, sitting by designation. matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Johnson v. Columbia Prop. Anchorage, LP,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.