Manzo

United States v. Manzo

Good Law
675 F.3d 1204·2012 WL 1130270
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 201210-35848, 10-35849, 10-35871California3,811 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Jose Luis Manzo (“Manzo”) appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate the sentences he received after (1) his jury conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to manufacture a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (c), 846; (2) his guilty plea to distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1); and (3) his guilty plea to a supervised release violation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 , 2253, and we reverse and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

Manzo was charged, inter alia, with conspiracy to possess pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine (“the manufacturing case”) and with distribution of 50 or more grams of actual methamphetamine (“the distribution case”). Manzo was also charged with a supervised release violation. Manzo went to trial in the manufacturing case, the jury found him guilty, and sentencing was continued pending resolution of the charges in the distribution case.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Manzo pleaded guilty in the distribution case. By accepting the plea agreement, Manzo agreed, inter alia, to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.