OKLEVUEHA NATIVE AMERICAN CHURCH v. Holder

Good Law
676 F.3d 829
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 201210-17687California4,796 words

Opinion

Opinion

MURGUIA, J.

Michael Andrew Glenn, Low Cost Legal Services, Honolulu, HI, for the appellants.

James C. Luh, Lowell V. Sturgill, Jr., and Mark Stern, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, and Derrick K. Watson, Office of the United States Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for the appellees.

Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, STEPHEN S. TROTT, and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Oklevueha Native American Church of Hawaii, Inc. ("Oklevueha") and Michael Rex Mooney a.k.a. Raging Bear appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint and judgment in favor of Defendants the U.S. Attorney General, the Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA"), and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Hawaii (collectively, "Government"). Plaintiffs' action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief barring the Government from enforcing the Controlled Substances Act ("CSA") against them and for return or compensation for marijuana taken by the Government. Plaintiffs allege that they consume marijuana as a "sacrament/eucharist" in their religious ceremonies, and that their use is protected by the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA"). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.