AD

A.D. v. Markgraf

Good Law
676 F.3d 868·2012 WL 1205714·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7276
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 201209-16460, 09-17635California315 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion filed April 6, 2011, and appearing at 636 F.3d 555 (9th Cir.2011), is withdrawn. Carver v. Lehman, 558 F.3d 869, 878-79 (9th Cir.2009) (a panel may withdraw an opinion sua sponte before the mandate issues). It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. With the opinion withdrawn, the petition for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc upon the filing of a new decision by the court.

The parties are ordered to submit supplemental briefs addressing the following issues and how they affect this case. The parties may, in their discretion, address other issues, but the court is primarily concerned with the issues enumerated below.

Defendant-Appellant shall file a supplemental brief not to exceed twenty pages within fourteen days from the date of this order. Plaintiffs-Appellees shall file a re sponsive brief not to exceed twenty pages within fourteen days from the date of the filing of Defendant-Appellant’s supplemental brief. Defendant-Appellant may also file an optional reply brief not to exceed ten pages within fourteen days after the responsive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.