prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 13,545 General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Gary D. Doupnik, Jr.

Good Law
1 F.3d 862·93 Daily Journal DAR 9691·1993 WL 281636·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19396·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5702
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 199392-15166California2,507 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

Gary Doupnik appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of General Motors in its diversity action for equitable indemnity under California law. The court ordered indemnity from Gary Doupnik for 80 percent of a $1.6 million loss of consortium judgment that was rendered in favor of Sally Doupnik, Gary’s spouse, in an underlying state action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse.

BACKGROUND

On January 8, 1983, Gary Doupnik and a friend were returning from a wedding reception when Doupnik lost control of the General Motors car he was driving. Doupnik’s ear left the road, went down an embankment, rolled over, and came to a stop upside down. The evidence indicated that Doupnik had been drinking prior to the accident. Defective welds in a pillar post of the car caused the body to collapse on the driver’s side. Doupnik was rendered a quadriplegic.

Gary Doupnik filed suit in state court against General Motors, alleging that the defective roof welds caused his injuries. The jury found that Doupnik had sustained injuries in the amount of $6,668,212. The jury also found that Doupnik was liable for 80 percent of his injuries and that General…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.