Insurance Company of North America v. G.I. Trucking Company

Bad Law
1 F.3d 903·93 Daily Journal DAR 9858·1993 WL 284964·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19687·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5780
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 199392-15234California2,266 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiggins, J.

FACTS

On April 19, 1988, G.I. Trucking Company (“G.I.”) transported a shipment of intraocular lenses from Los Angeles to Calexico, California, for Eye Technology, Inc. (“Eye Tech”). The shipment was damaged, and Eye Tech sought and received compensation for its damages from its insurer, Insurance Company of North America (“INA”). Having paid Eye Tech’s claim, INA became the subrogee of Eye Tech’s rights against G.I.

On December 2, 1988, Recovery Services, International (“RSI”), INA’s subrogation unit, sent a letter to G.I. stating:

On March 3, 1989, INA paid Eye Tech $97,500, and on March 27, 1989, RSI forwarded a “Standard Form for Presentation of Loss” to G.I., claiming entitlement to $100,000.00. On April 4, 1989, G.I. denied responsibility and refused to pay the claim. The parties corresponded over the course of several months, but G.I. continued to deny any liability on INA’s claim.

On April 4, 1991, INA filed suit against G.I. in California State court. INA asserted two causes of action, one for carrier liability and one for negligence. G.I. denied the allegations and removed the action to federal district court. G.I. then filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.