United States v. The Parsons Corp., United States of America v. The Parsons Corp.

Good Law
1 F.3d 944·93 Daily Journal DAR 10155·1993 WL 291730·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20143·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5914
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 199390-56328, 90-56329California1,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

The Department of Energy (DOE) loaned $99.6 million to two subsidiaries of the Parsons Corporation so they could develop a geothermal power plant. See The Geothermal Loan Guaranty Program, 10 C.F.R. pt. 790 (1990). In return, Parsons guaranteed it would pay DOE up to $3 million if its subsidiaries defaulted. A year later that’s what happened: The project collapsed, the borrowers defaulted and the government came looking for its money. At trial, Parsons managed to convince a jury that an escape clause in its guarantee agreement let it off the hook for the $3 million. The government appeals, claiming the district court asked the jury the wrong questions and the jury gave wrong answers to the questions it was asked. Parsons also appeals, claiming it’s entitled to collect its attorney’s fees from the government.

Discussion

1. The United States challenges the special verdict form and jury instructions. It claims that even though it failed to object at trial as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 51, it should nonetheless be able to appeal because the district court was fully aware of its position. The government says a formal objection would have been redundant. United States ex rel. Reed v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.