Stephen Bishop v. James P. McFadden

1 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephen BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James P. McFADDEN, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15062. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 3, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Stephen Bishop appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint against three prison officials. Bishop is the legal assistant for protective segregation inmates incarcerated in the maximum security facility in Florence, Arizona. He claims that the defendants violated his rights and those of the prisoners he represents by refusing to provide facilities for confidential communication and by providing insufficient opportunities for the transfer of legal materials. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 Bishop's arguments are somewhat unclear, but "we must liberally…