Brant v. County of Stanislaus

1 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leroy David BRANT, Doris Marie Brant, Dennis V. Brant and Timothy Lee Brant, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem Doris Marie Brant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, City of Modesto; Burl Condit, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Modesto and Tim David, individually and as a police officer for the City of Modesto, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16916. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1993. Decided July 29, 1993. Before FERGUSON, CANBY and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Leroy David Brant, Doris Marie Brant, and their sons Dennis and Timothy ("the Brants") appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Stanislaus County, the City of Modesto, and two County and City police officers, Burl Condit and Tim David. The Brants' complaint alleged violations of their federal constitutional rights…