Michael D. Leeds v. James E. Sexson Josephine Hawthorne Robert W. Smith Chris L. Wheeler William Young

1 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael D. LEEDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. SEXSON; Josephine Hawthorne; Robert W. Smith; Chris L. Wheeler; William Young; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35231. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1993. Decided July 29, 1993. Before GOODWIN, FARRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We previously remanded Leeds' Sec. 1983 action for a hearing in the district court on punitive damages and injunctive relief. See Leeds v. Sexson, Memorandum Decision, No. 89-35317 (9th Cir. July 10, 1990). Leeds now appeals pro se only the district court's denial of his claims for injunctive relief and his petitions for attorneys' fees and costs. We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 During a state budget crisis in 1982, Leeds was laid off from his position at the Oregon Water Resources Department. Under Oregon law, Leeds and other laid off state employees have certain rights to be…