Davis v. City and County of San Francisco

1 F.3d 1246 63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 768 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert DAVIS; Jane Kennedy; Angela Wingate; Jan Sutter; Mary Ann Wold; Susan Tibbon; and Anna Marie Karsant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipality; Art Agnos, Mayor of San Francisco; the San Francisco Unified School District, a municipal agency; the San Francisco Board of Education, a municipal agency; Ramon C. Cortines; Sodonia M. Wilson, Ph.D; Leland Y. Yee, Ph.D; Rosario Anaya; Myra G. Kopf; Joanne Miller; Libby Denebeim; and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16579. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1993. Decided July 15, 1993. Before FLETCHER, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants, nonminority male and female teachers, challenged as discriminatory the employment practices of the San Francisco Unified School District ("SFUSD" or the "District") taken…