Ramon Del Rio v. Eddie Ylst, Warden, C. Grahm, J. Carlson, R. Vaughn, D.M. Glenn, Roberts and R.W. Ormsby

1 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramon DEL RIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden, C. Grahm, J. Carlson, R. Vaughn, D.M. Glenn, Roberts and R.W. Ormsby, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15047. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 3, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Del Rio, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order granting appellees' motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Rio claims that appellees were deliberately indifferent to his safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment and that appellees refused to comply with discovery, depriving him of crucial documents needed to litigate his claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment. Jones v. Union Pacific R.R., 968 F.2d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1992). We must…