Ginn Doose, A/K/A Virginia M. Doose v. The Federal Court the Federal Government

1 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ginn DOOSE, a/k/a Virginia M. Doose, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The FEDERAL COURT; the Federal Government, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55489. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided July 28, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ginn Doose appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her complaint brought against the district court after it denied her permission to proceed in forma pauperis in another action. The district court here first denied her leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and then, after she paid the filing fees, dismissed her action for failure to raise any issue cognizable in federal court. We construe the district court's order in this action as a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. See Franklin v. Oregon, 662 F.2d 1337, 1342 (9th Cir.1981) (affirming dismissal of "wholly insubstantial" complaints for lack of…