Lemonta Renna McBroom v. California Board of Prison Terms, and Ron Koieng

1 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lemonta Renna MCBROOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, and Ron Koieng, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16834. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided July 30, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lemonta Renna McBroom, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. The district court dismissed the action on res judicata grounds, finding that McBroom had filed an unsuccessful habeas petition in federal court based on the same facts and raising the same questions of law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo a district court's dismissal on res judicata grounds, Hawkins v. Risley, 984 F.2d 321, 323 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Broom filed his section 1983 action…