United States v. Lisa Marie Kuffel

Good Law
1 F.3d 1247·1993 WL 290129·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26574
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 199392-50001California583 words

Opinion

Opinion

1 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa Marie KUFFEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided July 30, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before FLETCHER, POOLE and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 Kuffel appeals her sentence, contending that an enhancement under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c) is inappropriate because the statutory phrase "second or subsequent conviction" is vague and ambiguous. 1 We affirm. 2 A jury convicted Kuffel of four counts of bank robbery (in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a), (d)) and three counts of carrying a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence (in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)). The district court subsequently sentenced her to a total of 53 years, 4 months incarceration--100 months for the bank robberies, and 540 months for the Sec. 924(c) offenses. 3 Kuffel's argument regarding Sec. 924(c) has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.