Perry v. LeBaron

1 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tim PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aundre LeBARON, Brenda Burns, Carol Ployhar, Don Helling, Roger Jacobs, Robin Bates, John Ignacio, Glen Whorton, Peter Demosthenes, Does I-X, and Doe Corporations or Entities I-V, all in their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 1993. Decided July 28, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** 1 Before HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and REAL * , Chief District Judge. 2 Tim Perry (Perry), a third-time Driving Under the Influence (DUI) offender, appeals the district court's dismissal, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), of his action and its denial of his motion to reconsider that dismissal. Perry also appeals several discovery rulings. We do not reach those issues, as we affirm the dismissal of Perry's action. We review the dismissal de novo. See Oscar v. University Students Co-operative Ass'n, 965 F.2d…