United States v. Oliver N. Gill, Jr.

Good Law
1 F.3d 1247·1993 WL 290163·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26588
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 199392-30346California723 words

Opinion

Opinion

1 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver N. GILL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30346. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided July 28, 1993. Before FARRIS, FERGUSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Oliver Gill pleaded guilty to being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g), and his sentence was enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (e). Gill appeals the district court's refusal to exercise its supervisory power to reduce his sentence in response to prosecutorial delay. Gill also collaterally challenges the constitutionality of his prior convictions serving as predicates for the Sec. 924(e) enhancement. We affirm. 3 Our review of a district court's exercise of its supervisory powers is for abuse of discretion, United States v. Simpson, 813 F.2d 1462 , 1465 n. 2 (9th Cir.1987), so our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.