United States v. Richard Samuel Huffhines

Good Law
1 F.3d 1247·1993 WL 299412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 199392-50705California1,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

1 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Samuel HUFFHINES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50705. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 3, 1993. 1 Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 A jury convicted Richard Samuel Huffhines of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Huffhines appealed his conviction and sentence. We affirmed his conviction but vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing on the grounds that the district court erred in considering this crime to be a crime of violence and in sentencing Huffhines as a career offender under section 4B1.1 of the sentencing guidelines. United States v. Huffhines, 967 F.2d 314 (9th Cir.1992). 4 On remand the district court sentenced Huffhines to thirty three months in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.