Robert Wright v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
1 F.3d 1248·1993 WL 239570·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26552
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 199392-15377California998 words

Opinion

Opinion

1 F.3d 1248 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15377. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 27, 1993.* Withdrawn July 1, 1993. Decided July 1, 1993. Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Appellant's petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The memorandum filed in this case on February 3, 1993 is withdrawn. Concurrent with this order, we file a memorandum. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Robert Wright appeals pro se from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of United Airlines (United) in Wright's employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Wright contends that the district court erroneously found that the voluntary withdrawal of his first charge of employment discrimination barred his suit. Wright had received a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.