United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff and Thomas W. Mariani

Caution
1 F.3d 1523·93 Daily Journal DAR 9929·1993 WL 286783·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21322·38 ERC (BNA) 1365
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 199392-10105, 92-10108California6,928 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Michael H. Weitzenhoff and Thomas W. Mariani, who managed the East Honolulu Community Services Sewage Treatment Plant, appeal their convictions for violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq., contending that 1) the district court misconstrued the word “knowingly” under section 1319(c)(2) of the CWA; 2) the court improperly permitted witnesses to testify as to the meaning of the terms and provisions of the permit issued to the East Honolulu plant; 3) the court erred in concluding that the permit was not unconstitutionally vague; 4) evidence they sought to introduce concerning a regulation proposed by the EPA was improperly excluded; 5) the court erred in refusing their proposed instruction on entrapment by estoppel; and 6) the court should have granted a mistrial due to prosecutorial misconduct. In addition, Mariani contends that his sentence was improperly adjusted upward for obstruction of justice based on his testimony at trial.

We affirm the convictions and sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1988 and 1989 Weitzenhoff was the manager and Mariani the assistant manager of the East Honolulu Community Services Sewage Treatment Plant (“the plant”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.