Terence Philip Ramsden v. United States

Good Law
2 F.3d 322·93 Daily Journal DAR 10644·1993 WL 310651·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20801·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 199392-55213California2,753 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

The Government appeals the district court’s order granting Mr. Ramsden’s motion for the return of illegally seized documents pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On July 23,1991, the District Court for the Central District of California issued a provisional arrest warrant for Ramsden at the request of the British government. The warrant was based on the British government’s investigation into charges that Ramsden engaged in fraudulent trading and false accounting in the United Kingdom.

Early on the morning of September 8, 1991, two deputy U.S. marshals went to Ramsden’s hotel room to execute the war rant. Escorted by two hotel security guards and the hotel manager, they went to Rams-den’s room and knocked on the door. When Ramsden answered, the marshals requested that he step out into the hallway, where he was placed under arrest.

Ramsden was allowed to reenter his room in order to change clothes. The marshals escorted Ramsden inside at which point they noticed loose papers on a desk and on the floor surrounding the desk. They also noticed a suitcase…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.