Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Shoop

Good Law
2 F.3d 948·93 Daily Journal DAR 10505·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20623·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6113
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 199391-35494California3,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

2 F.3d 948 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as manager of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Fund, successor in interest to the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Central Illinois Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeff SHOOP, a/k/a Jeffrey W. Shoop; Bill Boyer, a/k/a William L. Boyer; Ronald J. Slovak; John C. Kafka, Defendants, and Robert F. Kafka, d/b/a BS Partnership, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-35494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1993. Decided Aug. 16, 1993. Mark E. Noennig, Hendrickson, Everson, Noennig & Woodward, P.C., Billings, MT, for defendant-appellant Robert Kafka. Kenneth S. Frazier, Felt & Martin, and Randall G. Nelson, Billings, MT, for plaintiff-appellee FDIC. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, James F. Battin, District Judge, Presiding. Before: WRIGHT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: 1 The FDIC sued on a promissory note for FSLIC as successor to a failed savings and loan association. The debtors on the note claim that the suit is barred by Montana's "one action rule." Montana and several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.