Jose Armando Barboza-Blanco Gerson Armando Barboza-Hernandez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

2 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Armando BARBOZA-BLANCO; Gerson Armando Barboza-Hernandez, Petitioners, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70567. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 6, 1993. * Decided Aug. 13, 1993. Before NORRIS, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The BIA affirmed the immigration judge's order of deportation on June 5, 1992. On August 14, 1992, Barboza-Blanco filed a motion to reopen before the BIA. Subsequently, on August 17, 1992, Barboza-Blanco filed this petition for review. 3 The motion to reopen rendered the decision of the BIA nonfinal for purposes of review in this court. Chu v. INS, 875 F.2d 777, 779-80 (9th Cir.1989); Fayazi-Azad v. INS, 792 F.2d 873, 874 (9th Cir.1986); Hyun Joon Chung v. INS, 720 F.2d 1471, 1474 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1216 (1984). We therefore lack jurisdiction to hear the merits of Barboza-Blanco's…