Wallace S. Birdwell v. Kevin Concannon, Director, Oregon State Department of Human Resources Charles Crookham Denise G. Fjordbeck

2 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wallace S. BIRDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kevin CONCANNON, Director, Oregon State Department of Human Resources; Charles Crookham; Denise G. Fjordbeck, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36926. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 2, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Wallace S. Birdwell appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim against the defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 Birdwell's amended complaint, 1 construed liberally, alleged that the defendants wrongfully "assigned" his family's Social Security benefits in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 407 2 when those benefits were considered as income in the denial of his application for Aid for Families with Dependent Children. Birdwell sought damages for alleged violations of various…