Miguel Angel Covarrubias-Avilez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
2 F.3d 1156·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28285
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 199392-70284California370 words

Opinion

Opinion

2 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Miguel Angel COVARRUBIAS-AVILEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70284. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 21, 1993. * Decided Aug. 4, 1993. Before BROWNING, TANG and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Migel Angel Covarrubias-Avilez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), affirming the Immigration judge (IJ) and ordering him deported to Mexico as having violated a law relating to a controlled substance, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(2)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1106 (a), and affirm. 1 3 Covarrubias-Avilez contends that the BIA erred by holding him deportable because he was not advised by the district court that his guilty plea to the controlled substance offense would result in his deportation. This argument is foreclosed by our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.