The Arlington Group, a California Limited Partnership v. City of Riverside, a Municipal Corporation

2 F.3d 1156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The ARLINGTON GROUP, a California limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55580. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided Aug. 10, 1993. 1 Before: WOOD ** , REINHARDT and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 The Arlington Group appeals the district court's dismissal and grant of summary judgment on various claims against the City of Riverside and city officials regarding the denial of Arlington's application for approval of a plan for subdivision of a portion of the River Ranch property, which is located in the City. Arlington argues that the district court erred in rejecting its claims under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 and the Due Process Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Contract Clause of the Constitution. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we…