Robert A. Lynch v. State of Alaska

Good Law
2 F.3d 1157·1993 WL 244830·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28198
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 199393-35061California454 words

Opinion

Opinion

2 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert A. LYNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALASKA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35061. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1993. * Decided July 7, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert A. Lynch appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the State of Alaska and several individuals. Lynch appears to challenge a state court holding that the taillights on Lynch's car were not functioning just prior to a collision with another car. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's determination that a complaint is frivolous under section 1915(d) for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). A complaint is frivolous if "it lacks an arguable basis in law or in fact." Neitzke v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.