Martin Allen Johnson v. United States Bureau of Prisons

2 F.3d 1157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martin Allen JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-36230. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1993. Decided Aug. 4, 1993. 1 Before FARRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and HARDY, 1 District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 2 Martin Allen Johnson, a federal prisoner, filed this action in 1990, alleging that constitutional rights had been violated when fifteen days of his federal statutory good time were forfeited in a disciplinary proceeding in the state of Washington. He sought both an injunction to have his good time reinstated and damages. The district court dismissed his action, and he appealed. 3 Johnson is presently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution at Tucson, Arizona. In 1991, he filed in the District Court for Arizona, a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus seeking restoration of the fifteen days forfeited as…